How do courts address inconsistent medical records in injury cases?

Inconsistent medical records require careful analysis distinguishing mistakes from credibility issues. Minor inconsistencies rarely defeat claims if overall treatment supports injuries. Significant contradictions need explanation through testimony or additional evidence. Common inconsistencies involve pain levels, accident descriptions, or symptom onset. Reasons include communication errors, rushed documentation, or evolving symptoms. Expert testimony may explain medical documentation practices. Cross-examination explores inconsistency significance. Contemporaneous records carry more weight than later summaries. Multiple provider records may clarify discrepancies. Strategic approaches acknowledge inconsistencies while emphasizing overall evidence supporting claims.