Courts allow juries to weigh conflicting eyewitness accounts, considering credibility, consistency, and corroboration. Factors include witness vantage points, attention levels, memory quality, and potential biases. Physical evidence helps resolve conflicts. Prior inconsistent statements impeach witnesses. Expert testimony on eyewitness reliability may be admissible. Cross-examination exposes weaknesses. Jury instructions address credibility assessment. Courts rarely dismiss cases solely for testimonial conflicts. Circumstantial evidence supports preferred versions. Video evidence increasingly resolves disputes. Multiple consistent witnesses strengthen positions. Neutral witnesses carry more weight than interested parties. Documentation contemporaneous with events enhances reliability.