Voir dire allows attorneys to question prospective jurors identifying biases, experiences, and attitudes affecting case decisions. Effective voir dire uncovers hidden prejudices through open-ended questions encouraging discussion. Challenges for cause remove clearly biased jurors while limited peremptory challenges eliminate unfavorable jurors without stating reasons. Batson challenges prevent discriminatory strikes based on protected characteristics. Jury consultants help develop profiles and questions. Pretrial publicity may expand voir dire scope. Mini-opening statements sometimes permitted to frame questions. Social media research supplements courtroom questioning. Time limits force strategic question priorities. Rehabilitation attempts save otherwise favorable jurors. Venue differences affect jury pool composition and attitudes.