Is a landlord liable when a broken gate or lock let an attacker onto the property?


A landlord can sometimes be held responsible when a failed gate or lock allowed an intruder to reach a tenant or guest. Georgia ties that responsibility to the landlord’s duty of ordinary care and to whether the breakdown in security helped enable a foreseeable crime.

A landlord’s duty over common areas

Georgia premises law obligates an owner or occupier to use ordinary care to keep the premises and approaches safe under O.C.G.A. § 51-3-1, and a landlord generally retains control over shared spaces such as entry gates, perimeter fencing, lobbies, and stairwells. Within those areas the landlord, not the individual tenant, is typically the party responsible for upkeep and security. When that duty includes guarding against foreseeable criminal acts, a broken access control can be the precise failure that a claim targets.

Broken access controls and foreseeability

A defective lock or gate matters most when crime on the property was reasonably foreseeable. Georgia courts examine foreseeability through prior substantially similar incidents, consistent with Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. Walker, and through the broader circumstances of the location. Where a landlord knew of earlier break-ins or assaults, a jury may consider whether keeping access controls in working order was part of the reasonable care owed. Common failures include:

  • A perimeter gate stuck open or with a broken latch.
  • An exterior door lock that no longer engaged.
  • A controlled-entry system the landlord knew was defective and left unrepaired.

Notice is often pivotal. A landlord who knew or should have known a gate or lock was broken, yet failed to fix it within a reasonable time, may be found to have breached the duty of care.

Linking the defect to the attack

The broken hardware must connect to the harm. An injured person generally has to show that the defect allowed the attacker access that a working gate or lock would have prevented or hindered, and that the danger was foreseeable. O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 then assigns percentages of fault to the landlord, the injured person, and the intruder who slipped through. The injured person’s share reduces the recovery proportionally, and reaching 50 percent or more of the fault bars recovery altogether. When suit must be filed is fixed by the two-year limit in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33.

The bottom line

A Georgia landlord may be liable when a broken gate or lock in an area under its control let an attacker in, the crime was foreseeable, and the defect helped cause the harm. The case turns on the landlord’s notice of the problem and the property’s crime history, with Georgia’s fault rules deciding how responsibility is shared.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply