Do I need my UM insurer’s consent before settling with the at-fault driver in Georgia?
Georgia law generally lets an injured person settle with the at-fault driver’s liability insurer without first obtaining permission from their own uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) carrier, provided the settlement is structured to protect the UM carrier’s rights. The mechanism that makes this possible is the limited release.
The limited-release route ¶
A standard release given in exchange for the at-fault driver’s policy limits ordinarily wipes out any further claim against that driver. That creates a problem, because the UM carrier is entitled to step into the injured person’s shoes and pursue the at-fault driver for whatever it later pays. To preserve both sides, Georgia recognizes a limited release under O.C.G.A. § 33-24-41.1. A limited release lets a claimant accept the liability insurer’s offer while expressly keeping intact the UM carrier’s right to recover from the at-fault driver. Because the at-fault driver is not fully released, the UM carrier’s subrogation interest survives.
For policies governed by this framework, the UM insurer’s formal consent is not the gatekeeper to settling with the liability carrier. What matters is that the release follows the statutory form and gives the UM carrier proper notice and the chance to protect itself.
Why notice still matters ¶
Although consent is not required, ignoring the UM carrier can be costly. The claimant typically must:
- Notify the UM carrier of the proposed settlement and its terms.
- Give the carrier an opportunity to advance the settlement amount and preserve its subrogation claim, if it chooses.
- Use a release that does not extinguish the at-fault driver’s exposure to the UM carrier.
If a claimant signs a broad, unconditional release without these protections, the UM carrier may argue that its subrogation rights were destroyed and that the UM claim is impaired. That dispute can reduce or defeat the later UM recovery, so the form of the release carries real weight.
The bottom line ¶
In Georgia, settling with the at-fault driver’s insurer does not hinge on the UM insurer’s blessing, but it does hinge on doing it correctly. A limited release under § 33-24-41.1 keeps the underinsured-motorist claim alive while protecting the UM carrier’s right to pursue the at-fault driver. Skipping that step, rather than skipping consent, is what usually puts a UM claim at risk.
This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.