Does Georgia bad-faith law cover claims against the other driver’s insurer?
The bad-faith penalty in O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6 is built around the relationship between an insurer and its own policyholder, so an injured person who is not insured by the at-fault driver’s carrier cannot use that statute against the other side’s insurer. Georgia does, however, give a third-party claimant one narrow statutory bad-faith remedy against the at-fault driver’s insurer: O.C.G.A. § 33-4-7, which is confined to motor-vehicle property-damage claims and does not reach bodily-injury claims.
Why the statute is first-party ¶
Section 33-4-6 penalizes an insurer that refuses, without reasonable justification, to pay a covered loss owed to its own insured. The duty runs from the insurer to the person it insures. An injured claimant pursuing the at-fault driver’s liability coverage is a third party to that policy, not a party to the insurance contract. As a result, the third party usually lacks the direct first-party relationship the statute requires, and § 33-4-6 is not the vehicle for that claimant to penalize the other driver’s insurer.
This is a frequent source of confusion, because both situations involve “an insurance company behaving badly.” The legal distinction is who the insurer owes a contractual duty to pay.
Which statutes reach which insurer ¶
The cleanest way to keep these straight is by the contractual relationship each rule protects:
- The injured person’s own insurer. A first-party dispute, such as a delay in paying uninsured-motorist or medical-payments coverage, is where § 33-4-6 actually operates, because the claimant is the policyholder the statute protects.
- The at-fault driver’s insurer. A third party with a vehicle or property loss can invoke § 33-4-7, which imposes an affirmative duty on the liability insurer to investigate, evaluate, and settle a property-damage claim in good faith once liability is reasonably clear. A breach exposes the insurer to a penalty of the greater of 50 percent of the insured’s liability or $5,000.00 plus attorney’s fees, but the claimant must first send a statutory demand and allow 60 days to settle. Because § 33-4-7 stops at property damage, a third party’s bodily-injury claim has no parallel statute; the only leverage there comes from the separate duty a liability insurer owes its own insured to settle reasonably, a duty that protects the at-fault driver rather than the injured claimant.
The takeaway is a matter of categories: § 33-4-6 is keyed to the claimant’s own policy, § 33-4-7 reaches the other driver’s insurer only for property damage, and a third party’s injury claim depends on a separate, insured-protective settlement duty rather than any direct statutory bad-faith right.
The bottom line ¶
Georgia’s § 33-4-6 bad-faith penalty is a first-party remedy and does not let an injured claimant punish the at-fault driver’s insurer, because the claimant is not that insurer’s policyholder. The one statute aimed at the other carrier, § 33-4-7, covers a third party’s property-damage loss but not a bodily-injury claim. For injuries, then, the claimant has no direct statutory bad-faith right against the at-fault carrier and must rely on that insurer’s separate duty to its own insured to settle within policy limits.
This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.