Can the defendant tell the jury my health insurance already paid my bills in Georgia?


The answer now depends on when the incident happened. For older claims, Georgia’s traditional collateral source rule kept a negligent defendant from telling the jury that the injured person’s health insurance, or another outside source, already covered the medical bills. But a 2025 tort-reform statute, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-1.1 (enacted by Senate Bill 68), reversed that for newer cases and now lets the jury hear what insurance actually paid.

The collateral source rule

A collateral source is a benefit the injured person receives from somewhere other than the defendant, such as private health insurance, an employer, or a government program. Under long-standing Georgia case law, evidence of these payments was kept from the jury in a personal-injury trial. The reasoning was that the person who caused the harm should not get credit for a benefit the victim secured on their own, often by paying premiums for years. Letting the jury hear that bills were “already paid” risked tempting it to award less than the full value of the harm.

For decades Georgia courts applied this protection broadly, treating such evidence as inadmissible even when the defendant wanted to use it to suggest the loss was less significant than claimed. That traditional rule still controls claims arising before the 2025 statute took effect, and it extended to gratuitous care, so the result was the same whether the help came from an insurer or a generous third party.

Where the line can shift

The biggest change came with SB 68. For causes of action arising on or after April 21, 2025, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-1.1 allows the trier of fact to consider what public or private health insurance, including workers’ compensation, actually paid, and it caps medical special damages at the reasonable value of necessary care rather than the full billed amount. In those newer cases the defendant can put the paid amount in front of the jury, so the blanket protection no longer applies. Even under the older rule, insurance evidence could come in if the injured person opened the door, for example by testifying in a way that created a false impression about their finances or ability to obtain care.

A separate point sometimes causes confusion. The collateral source rule governs what the jury hears at trial. It is distinct from a health insurer’s or hospital’s later right to be reimbursed out of a recovery through subrogation or a lien, which is handled apart from the verdict and does not entitle the defendant to a courtroom discount.

The bottom line

Whether a Georgia defendant can tell the jury that health insurance already paid the medical bills turns on the date of the incident. For claims arising before April 21, 2025, the traditional collateral source rule generally keeps that information out, with narrow exceptions tied mainly to the injured person’s own testimony. For claims arising on or after that date, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-1.1 lets the jury hear what insurance paid and limits medical damages to the reasonable value of the care.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply