Can I get a protective order to limit intrusive discovery requests in Georgia?


Yes. Georgia law gives a party, or even a non-party who is asked for information, a way to ask the court to rein in discovery that goes too far. The mechanism is a protective order under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-26(c), and it exists precisely because broad discovery can sometimes be used to harass rather than to gather evidence.

The standard the court applies

A protective order is not granted just because a request is inconvenient. The person seeking it must show good cause, and the court may then enter any order that justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. That language sets the bar: the request must impose a real, unjustified weight, not merely require some effort to respond.

Good cause usually rests on specifics rather than generalities. A court is more persuaded by a concrete showing, such as a demand that sweeps in highly sensitive personal records unrelated to the claim, a request duplicating material already produced, or a deposition scheduled in a way designed to inconvenience, than by a blanket complaint that discovery feels intrusive.

What protection can look like

The statute lets the court tailor relief to the problem. Depending on the situation, an order might:

  • Forbid a particular discovery request altogether.
  • Limit the scope, time, place, or manner of the discovery.
  • Require that certain matters not be inquired into, or be inquired into only on specified terms.
  • Direct that sensitive information be sealed or disclosed only to designated people.

This flexibility is the point. Rather than choosing between full disclosure and none, the court can carve out the truly intrusive piece while letting legitimate discovery proceed.

A caution about self-help

A protective order generally must be sought before simply refusing to respond. A party who unilaterally ignores a request, rather than moving for protection, risks a motion to compel and the loss of the objection. The orderly path is to raise the concern with the court through the § 9-11-26(c) process.

The bottom line

Georgia litigants can obtain a protective order under § 9-11-26(c) when they make a good-cause showing that a discovery request causes annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden. The remedy is flexible, allowing a judge to block or narrow the abusive portion while permitting fair discovery to continue, but it works best when sought proactively rather than as an after-the-fact excuse for nonresponse.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply