Can a defendant be liable when more than one cause contributed to my injury?
A defendant does not avoid responsibility just because something or someone else also helped cause the harm. Georgia law recognizes that injuries often have several contributing causes, and a careless party can be held liable as long as its conduct was a proximate cause of the injury, even if it was not the only one.
Concurrent causes and the meaning of “a” proximate cause ¶
Georgia does not require an injured person to prove that the defendant’s negligence was the sole cause of the harm. It is enough to show that the conduct was a substantial contributing factor in bringing about the injury. When two or more acts of negligence combine to produce a single result, each can be a concurrent proximate cause, and each negligent actor can be held accountable for the harm they helped create.
This principle prevents a defendant from deflecting blame simply by naming another contributor. A second cause changes the result only when it rises to a superseding one, which happens when an outside, unforeseeable event takes over as the genuine legal cause of the harm. If that additional cause was foreseeable, it leaves every contributor’s responsibility intact.
How fault gets divided among multiple causes ¶
Recognizing that more than one party can be at fault, Georgia uses an apportionment system. Under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33, a jury assigns a percentage of fault to each responsible party, and damages are allocated according to those percentages. The statute also allows fault to be apportioned to non-parties who contributed to the injury, which can affect how much any single defendant ultimately pays.
A few points follow from this structure:
- A defendant who is partly responsible generally pays in proportion to its assigned share of fault.
- Fault attributed to a person who is not even named in the lawsuit can reduce a defendant’s percentage.
- The injured person’s own share, if any, reduces recovery and bars it entirely at 50% or more.
Because of apportionment, the question is rarely “was this the only cause” and more often “what portion of the total fault belongs here.” That makes evidence about each contributor’s role central to the case.
The bottom line ¶
Multiple causes do not shield a Georgia defendant. A party whose negligence was a proximate cause can be liable even when other forces also contributed, and the apportionment rule then divides responsibility by percentage among everyone at fault. Liability ends only if another cause was both independent and unforeseeable enough to supersede the defendant’s conduct.
This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.