Can a Georgia jury assign fault to someone who is not even named in the lawsuit?


Yes. Georgia’s apportionment statute lets the trier of fact weigh the conduct of people who were never sued, and a percentage of blame placed on one of those absent actors can shrink what the named defendants owe. This “non-party at fault” rule is one of the most consequential features of how Georgia divides responsibility.

How non-party fault works

Under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33, a jury determines the total damages and then allocates fault by percentage among everyone who contributed to the harm, including individuals or companies who are not parties to the case. The statute is explicit that a fault percentage assigned to a non-party is used only to figure the share owed by the named parties. It does not create a judgment against the absent person, and the plaintiff cannot collect from a non-party based on that finding.

The practical effect is a reduction. If a jury decides an unnamed actor was 30% responsible, the defendants in the room are answerable only for their own combined share, and the slice attributed to the non-party simply comes off the recovery.

Why a defendant would point to an absent party

Naming a non-party gives the defense a way to spread responsibility beyond the courtroom. Common targets include:

  • A driver who fled the scene and was never identified or served.
  • A contractor, manufacturer, or property owner the plaintiff chose not to sue.
  • A settling party who resolved separately before trial.
  • An actor who is immune from suit or beyond the court’s reach.

Because shifting a share to someone absent can lower a verdict without that person ever defending the accusation, the rule changes how both sides build a case.

Limits the law imposes

A defendant cannot simply gesture at a stranger. Georgia requires advance notice that identifies the non-party and states the basis for blaming them, and the defense must put forward real evidence at trial, not speculation. The injured person can answer that proof, argue the absent actor bears little or none of the blame, and keep the focus on the parties actually before the court.

The bottom line

Georgia juries can and do place fault on people who were never sued, and that allocation directly reduces what named defendants pay. The empty chair is not automatic, though. It requires proper notice and supporting evidence, and a claimant can contest both the existence and the size of any non-party share.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply