Can I sue a trucking company’s insurance company directly in a Georgia truck accident case?


Georgia once stood out for letting an injured person name a motor carrier’s insurer as a defendant in the same lawsuit as the carrier and driver. That ability still exists, but a 2024 change sharply narrowed it, so whether a direct action is available now depends on when the claim arose and on specific facts about the case.

The narrowed direct-action rule

Under Georgia’s direct-action statutes, certain motor-carrier insurers could be joined directly in a suit arising from a truck crash, an unusual feature because most injury cases keep the insurer out of the courtroom until a judgment is entered. In 2024 the General Assembly passed Senate Bill 426, which took effect July 1, 2024 and applies to causes of action accruing on or after that date. The amendment limits direct joinder of the insurer to two situations:

  • The motor carrier is insolvent or in bankruptcy.
  • The driver or carrier cannot be personally served despite reasonable diligence.

For crashes after the effective date, those are generally the gateways to naming the insurer as a defendant. Claims that accrued before the change are governed by the prior, broader version of the law, so the date of the wreck matters a great deal.

Why this distinction matters

Whether the insurer is in the case affects how the dispute is framed and tried. Naming the insurer can keep the reality of available coverage in view, which some plaintiffs see as an advantage, while the defense generally prefers to keep the carrier’s insurance out of the jury’s mind. The new limits push most post-2024 cases back toward the conventional structure, where the injured person sues the driver and the motor carrier and pursues the policy proceeds through that judgment, unless one of the two narrow exceptions applies.

None of this changes the underlying liability theories against a trucking company, such as the driver’s negligence or the company’s own negligence in hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance. It governs only whether the insurer itself can be a named party.

The bottom line

In Georgia you can sometimes sue a trucking company’s insurer directly, but Senate Bill 426 limited that option, for claims accruing on or after July 1, 2024, to cases of carrier insolvency or bankruptcy or where the driver or carrier cannot be served. The accrual date controls which rule applies, so the timing of the crash is the first thing to pin down.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply