Can I sue if a child is hit near a stopped Georgia school bus with lights flashing?
When a child is struck near a school bus that has stopped with its red lights flashing and stop arm out, a civil claim against the driver who hit the child is generally available in Georgia. The flashing-light law creates a clear duty to stop, and a driver who ignores it and injures a child has likely committed both a serious traffic offense and an act of negligence.
The duty to stop for a loading or unloading bus ¶
Georgia requires traffic to halt for a school bus that is taking on or letting off children. Under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-163, a driver meeting or overtaking a school bus must stop when the bus displays its flashing red signals, and must stay stopped until the bus moves again or the signals are turned off. The flashing lights and extended stop arm exist precisely because children cross to and from the bus, so the law treats that moment as one of the most dangerous on the road.
There is a narrow exception. On a roadway divided by a median, an unpaved strip, or a barrier, a driver on the opposite side from the bus is generally not required to stop. Outside that situation, traffic in all affected directions must stop.
Turning the violation into a claim ¶
A driver who passes a stopped bus with its signals active and hits a crossing child has broken a protective statute, and Georgia generally labels such a breach negligence per se. In practice the bus-passing violation stands in for the proof of breach, leaving the case to turn on whether that violation caused the child’s injuries. The heightened-care duty toward children under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-93 reinforces this.
Whether a suit is viable also depends on practical factors:
- Whether the bus’s red lights and stop arm were actually activated at the time.
- Whether the divided-highway exception applied to the driver’s side of the road.
- Who has legal standing to bring the claim on the child’s behalf, usually a parent or guardian.
O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 ordinarily opens the door to weighing each party’s fault, but very young children are generally considered incapable of negligence, so a driver who ignored the bus signals seldom shifts meaningful blame onto the child. The time limit on a minor’s own claim can also be tolled, stretching the window to sue, though the governing deadlines should be confirmed for the specific facts.
The bottom line ¶
Yes, Georgia law generally permits a claim when a child is hit near a stopped school bus displaying its flashing red lights and stop arm, because a driver who fails to stop has violated a protective statute. The strength of the case depends on the activation of the bus signals, the divided-highway exception, and proper standing, with little room to blame a young child under Georgia’s comparative-fault rule.
This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.