How is a Georgia dog bite claim handled when the victim is a child?


A dog-bite claim involving a child in Georgia follows the same liability rules as an adult’s claim but with important procedural and timing differences that protect the minor. Because the injured person cannot bring suit on their own, a parent or guardian generally acts on the child’s behalf, and the deadline to sue works differently.

Liability is judged the same, defenses differently

The owner’s responsibility still rests on Georgia’s animal-injury statute, O.C.G.A. § 51-2-7, requiring a showing that the dog had a dangerous propensity the owner knew about or that a leash ordinance was violated, with no provocation by the victim. The difference appears in the defenses. A child’s conduct is measured by what is reasonable for a child of similar age and experience, so an owner has a harder time arguing the child provoked the dog, and very young children may be incapable of legal fault altogether.

Who brings the claim and how recovery is handled

Since a minor cannot sue in their own name, the case is typically pursued by a parent, guardian, or court-appointed representative. Several features are unique to a child’s claim:

  • A parent may have a separate claim for medical expenses paid on the child’s behalf during the child’s minority.
  • A settlement of a minor’s claim often requires court approval to ensure it is fair to the child.
  • Settlement funds may be placed in a protected account or structured arrangement for the child’s benefit.

These safeguards exist because the law guards a minor’s interests closely.

The extended deadline

Georgia’s two-year limitations period for personal injury under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33 is tolled for a minor under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-90, so the clock on the child’s own claim generally does not begin running in the ordinary way until the child reaches adulthood. A parent’s separate claim for expenses is not necessarily tolled the same way, so timing should not be assumed. Damages can be significant, given the disfiguring facial and scalp injuries children often suffer.

The bottom line

A child’s Georgia dog-bite claim uses the same liability framework as any bite case but adds protections: a child-appropriate provocation standard, representation by a parent or guardian, court oversight of settlements, and tolling of the child’s deadline. These differences make the procedural handling, not just the underlying fault, central.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply