Is a Georgia hospital liable for the negligence of its employee nurses?


A Georgia hospital can generally be held responsible for the negligence of nurses it employs. This rests on the long-standing principle that an employer answers for the wrongful acts of its employees committed within the scope of their work, which means a hospital’s liability often follows from the employment relationship rather than from anything the hospital did directly.

Vicarious liability for employees

Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer is liable for an employee’s negligence that occurs within the scope of employment. When a nurse is a hospital employee and commits a negligent act while performing job duties, the hospital can be held responsible for the resulting harm. The injured patient does not have to prove that the hospital itself was careless in some separate way; the negligence of the employed nurse, acting within the job, can be attributed to the hospital.

Examples of nursing conduct that may give rise to such liability include medication administration errors, failing to monitor a patient’s condition, not reporting significant changes to a physician, or failing to follow established care protocols. In each case, the question is whether the nurse deviated from the accepted nursing standard of care and whether the nurse was acting as a hospital employee within the scope of the job.

Where the employment question gets contested, and what proving the claim takes

The key variable is often whether the nurse was truly an employee acting within the scope of employment. Most staff nurses are hospital employees, which supports vicarious liability. Disputes can arise where a nurse was supplied by a staffing agency, was acting outside assigned duties, or where the hospital contends the conduct fell outside the scope of employment. Georgia looks at the substance of the relationship and the control exercised, not merely a label, when deciding whether the employer is answerable.

Once that link is established, the underlying claim is still one for medical malpractice, so O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 generally requires an expert affidavit addressing the nursing standard of care to be filed with the complaint. The deadline comes from O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71, ordinarily a two-year statute of limitations backed by a five-year statute of repose. And if the nurse was not the only one whose conduct hurt the patient, the jury does not treat the hospital as the sole responsible party: O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 directs it to place a percentage of fault on each contributing actor, so the hospital’s vicarious exposure is measured against whatever blame is also assigned to the physician or anyone else involved.

In short

A Georgia hospital is generally liable for the negligence of its employee nurses acting within the scope of their employment, under respondeat superior. The main issue is usually whether the nurse was an employee acting within the job, which turns on the real nature of the relationship rather than a label.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply