Is a minor’s property-damage claim tolled the same way as their injury claim?


A child’s claim for harm to property follows a different limitation period than the child’s bodily-injury claim, even though minority can suspend both. The starting length of each clock is set by the type of harm, and tolling for age only delays whichever period applies.

Two different limitation periods, one tolling rule

Georgia gives a personal-injury claim two years to be filed under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33, while damage to property carries a longer window. Injuries to personal property fall under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-31, and the relevant property-damage limitation in Georgia is four years rather than two. The age-based tolling provision, O.C.G.A. § 9-3-90, treats minority as a legal disability that suspends the running of the applicable period until the injured person reaches the age of majority.

That means the tolling mechanism is “the same” in the sense that it pauses the clock during childhood, but the underlying clock it pauses is not the same length. A bodily-injury claim and a property claim arising from the same incident can therefore mature on different schedules once the child turns 18.

Who actually owns the property claim

Whether tolling even matters for the property side often depends on ownership. A minor rarely holds title to a damaged vehicle; the car usually belongs to a parent or guardian. If the adult owns the property, the property-damage claim is the adult’s claim, and an adult under no disability does not get the benefit of minority tolling. In that situation the four-year property period runs in the ordinary way from the date of the damage.

A short way to see the distinction:

  • The child’s right to sue for bodily injury is suspended by minority and measured after adulthood.
  • A property claim belonging to an adult owner runs on its own four-year track from the loss, with no age-based pause.
  • Only property the child actually owns would carry the child’s tolling.

The bottom line

Minority can toll a child’s deadlines, but it does not erase the difference between a two-year injury period and the longer property-damage period, and it does not transfer an adult owner’s property claim onto the child’s protected timeline. Each claim should be measured by its own type, its own statutory length, and the legal status of whoever actually holds it.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply