What are my rights if a surgical instrument was left inside my body?
A sponge, clamp, or other item left inside a patient after surgery is treated as a serious surgical error under Georgia law, and the patient generally has the right to pursue a medical malpractice claim for the resulting harm. These retained-object cases are distinctive because the error is concrete and the standard meant to prevent it is well established.
A recognized category of preventable error ¶
Leaving a foreign object behind is widely regarded as a “never event,” meaning it should not occur when accepted surgical safeguards are followed. Hospitals use instrument and sponge counts before closing an incision precisely to catch these items. When the count fails or is skipped and an object remains, the deviation from the standard of care is usually apparent, and the patient often suffers infection, pain, or the need for additional surgery to remove it.
What a Georgia claim requires ¶
The case proceeds as a medical malpractice action, so the standard elements apply: a breach of the accepted standard of care and harm caused by that breach. To open such a suit, O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 obliges the patient to file a supporting affidavit from an expert who pinpoints the negligent act or omission. Even though a retained instrument may seem self-evident, expert testimony typically still explains how the counting protocol was violated and how the object caused the patient’s injuries.
Responsibility may rest with more than one participant. Depending on who performed the count and managed the surgical field, fault could extend to the surgeon, surgical nurses, or the facility, and a hospital may be liable for the negligence of its employees. When several people share the surgical field, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 permits the jury to apportion responsibility across each of them by percentage.
Timing and the discovery problem ¶
While O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 sets the general malpractice clock at two years to sue with a five-year repose cutoff, retained surgical objects fall under a separate rule. O.C.G.A. § 9-3-72 carves out foreign objects left in the body, giving a one-year window that runs from when the object is discovered or, with ordinary diligence, should have been discovered. That statute displaces both the two-year limitation and the five-year repose, which matters because a sponge or instrument may go undetected until symptoms surface years later. The statute also defines what counts: a chemical compound, fixation device, or prosthetic aid does not qualify as a foreign object under this section.
Recoverable harm may include the consequences of the retained object, removal surgery, and related losses. A patient’s compensation for pain and similar non-economic harm rides on no statutory cap, the result the Georgia Supreme Court reached in Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. Nestlehutt.
The bottom line ¶
A retained surgical instrument generally gives a patient the right to bring a Georgia malpractice claim, supported by an expert affidavit. Because discovery may come years later, confirming how the filing deadlines apply to the specific situation is important.
This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.