Who is at fault in a Georgia parking lot accident when both cars were backing out?


When two vehicles back out of opposing spaces and collide, Georgia law often treats both drivers as sharing responsibility, because each had the same duty to reverse only when it was safe to do so. Neither driver automatically has the right of way simply by having started first.

The shared duty to back safely

Georgia’s backing statute, O.C.G.A. § 40-6-240, says a driver may not back a vehicle unless the movement can be made safely and without interfering with other traffic. When both drivers are reversing, both are subject to that rule at the same time. That is why these collisions frequently end in divided fault: each driver was obligated to check behind, watch for movement, and yield to a hazard, and a collision suggests at least one, and often both, fell short.

Parking lots add a wrinkle. Many lot lanes are private property and may not be governed by the same posted signals as public roads, so the analysis leans on the general duty of ordinary care and the backing rule rather than on intersection right-of-way statutes.

How fault tends to be sorted out

Because two cars are moving in reverse with limited visibility, investigators look closely at sequence and awareness:

  • Which vehicle began backing first and was therefore more visible to the second.
  • Whether one driver was already substantially out of the space, effectively established in the lane, when the other started reversing.
  • The point of impact on each vehicle, which can show who moved into whom.
  • Any surveillance video, common in commercial lots, showing the timing.

A driver who was nearly clear of the space and into the travel lane when struck by a car just beginning to reverse may carry less fault than the driver who backed out blindly.

When both drivers share the blame

Because each reversing driver can be tagged with part of the blame, Georgia’s modified comparative-negligence statute, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33, becomes the arithmetic of the claim. The decision-maker pins a percentage on each driver and trims that driver’s award by their own figure. The catch is a ceiling: once a driver’s share reaches 50%, that driver collects nothing. Mutual-backing collisions are where this bites hardest, because they often land near an even split. If both drivers are judged equally to blame at 50/50, each sits at the 50% line, and the statute can leave both with no recovery against the other.

Putting it together

When two Georgia cars back out of opposing spaces and meet, blame is usually divided because both drivers carried the identical duty to reverse safely. Who was further into the lane, the sequence of movement, and any lot footage tend to decide whether the percentages come out even or lean toward the driver who reversed with less care, and an even split can erase both claims.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply