Is my doctor personally liable separately from the hospital that employs them?


A physician and the hospital can both be on the hook for the same injury under Georgia law, and they are not the same defendant. A doctor who breaches the standard of care answers personally for that negligence, while the hospital’s exposure depends on the employment relationship and on whether the institution did something wrong on its own.

The doctor’s personal responsibility

In Georgia, a licensed physician owes each patient a duty to exercise the degree of care and skill that a reasonably competent practitioner in the same specialty would use. When a doctor falls short of that standard and causes harm, that individual is directly liable, regardless of who signs the paychecks. To pursue the physician, a plaintiff must satisfy O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 by filing an expert’s affidavit with the complaint that names at least one negligent act and explains the basis for the opinion.

The doctor’s personal liability does not disappear simply because a larger institution was involved. The claim against the individual stands on its own facts.

How the hospital’s liability is different

A hospital can be liable along two distinct paths:

  • Vicarious liability. If the negligent provider is an actual employee acting within the scope of employment, the hospital answers for that employee’s conduct under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Many physicians, however, are independent contractors who merely hold privileges, and a hospital generally is not automatically responsible for an independent contractor’s malpractice.
  • Direct institutional negligence. Separate from any individual, a hospital can be liable for its own failures, such as negligent credentialing, inadequate staffing, faulty policies, or the negligence of its nurses and technicians who are employees.

Because of these two tracks, a single bad outcome can produce a claim against the physician personally and a separate claim against the hospital, each resting on different evidence.

Why the distinction matters for an injured patient

Sorting out the employment status of each provider is a central early question. A surgeon, anesthesiologist, or radiologist working at a hospital may be billed through a separate group and treated as an independent contractor, which affects whether the hospital can be held responsible for that person’s mistakes. Georgia courts examine the actual relationship, including the degree of control the hospital exercised, not just the label on a contract.

O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 lets a jury attach a percentage of fault to each responsible party. That means the doctor, the hospital, and any other negligent provider can each shoulder their own share rather than one defendant absorbing the whole of it.

The bottom line

Georgia treats the treating physician and the employing or affiliated hospital as separate potential defendants. The doctor remains personally accountable for clinical negligence, while the hospital’s responsibility depends on whether the provider was a true employee and on whether the institution itself acted carelessly. Both questions usually must be examined together to understand who answers for a given injury.


This article is for general educational and informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, and Georgia law may change. For advice about a specific situation, consult a licensed Georgia personal injury attorney.

Leave a Reply